Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Black Website touts Obama Hosting Iraq Vets With Intimate Dinner, ignores the fact he is cutting military health benefits… - Massachusetts School Serves “KKK” Chicken Tenders - Please pay for us to have sex … We’re going broke buying birth control - Registering Tim Tebow and Tom Brady to Vote in Minnesota - $750,000 of taxpayer money … for a new soccer field … in Guantanamo Bay! - Obama’s Kenyan colleague, COUSIN Prime Minister Raila Odinga

Obama To Honor Iraq Vets With Intimate Dinner - News One
 WASHINGTON  — Richard Nixon threw a huge gala for former Vietnam POWs. Harry Truman cheered at multiple parades honoring veterans of World War II. Andrew Johnson presided over the pageantry of a two-day review of Union troops at the end of the Civil War.

Now President Barack Obama is honoring the more than 1 million American troops who served in Iraq by welcoming a small cross-section to a formal dinner at the White House on Wednesday night. The dinner for 200 – about half military personnel or veterans and the rest their guests – will include service members from all 50 states and the U.S. territories.
Some are in their 20s; some in their 50s. One served just months in Iraq; one was deployed six times. Some left the military with life-altering wounds; most still serve. A widow will represent the loved ones of the nearly 4,500 Americans who died.
White House spokesman Jay Carney said the president had invited the Iraq veterans to the East Room dinner “to note the remarkable accomplishments and sacrifice of the men and women” who served in a long and difficult war.
The president, who called the war dumb and rash before it began, has missed no opportunity to celebrate its end, with frequent speeches, visits to troops and promises to ensure favorable treatment for returning veterans. In the process, he is able to underscore that the unpopular war ended on his watch – just as candidate Obama had promised.
Among those invited to Wednesday’s dinner was retired Marine Staff Sgt. Eric Alva, the first American to be injured in Iraq. Alva, 41, had a leg amputated after stepping on a land mine just hours after the war began. Alva said the dinner was a fitting way for the administration to recognize those who served in Iraq at a time when tens of thousands still are serving in Afghanistan.
“We’ve learned from our mistakes in Vietnam,” said Alva, adding that his father received no recognition when he returned home from serving in Vietnam.
Some service members believe something more expansive is warranted to recognize those who served in Iraq.

This is another of countless examples of how the black media are a bunch of mindless idiot ass… ass kissing Obama sycophants. Below is the top story on the News One website. Now most of you who read this blog or other conservative or right leaning sites already knew of Obama’s plan to fuck over our military citizens by jacking them on their healthcare.You will not see a single story or link on this issue.
The military (army, navy, marines, air force) are together the most racially integrated mass organization in the world. No organization nearly as large, anywhere, has more harmonious (which is not to say perfect) race relations, and none has as many whites being supervised by blacks as meaningful a proof of racial integration as one could ask for.
However in what is another example of media malpractice and in this case the “black media.” Knowing that Obama’s decision to screw military personal obviously will affect a significant number of blacks… well… don’t cover the real story on the pending military’s potential cut in medical benefits but cover instead the fact that Obama will serve them fried chicken to show his appreciation for their service.        

I swear if I were in the military and were invited to this farce I would boycott and tell Obama to kiss my ass.

Now below you will see another breaking story about "KKK chicken." Amazing how black people get their priorities so screwed up, no wonder so many are ignorant to reality... "ignorance is what allows liberalism to prosper"   

Obama to Cut Health Benefits for Active, Retired Military
Pro-troop group says Obama Punishes Military Families with Health Care Costs
Sacramento, Calif. – The nation’s largest grassroots pro-troop advocacy organization, Move America Forward came out strongly against President Obama’s proposed military defense budget, which cuts billions of dollars of military spending, especially at the cost of military families in higher healthcare costs. “We should be honoring and supporting our military families, not punishing them under President Obama’s proposed defense spending cuts.” said Debbie Lee, spokesperson for the group and mother of the first US Navy SEAL to be killed in the war in Iraq. “This budget slashes benefits for our troops and their families, but unionized civilian workers under contract working for the military are protected from the cuts. It’s an outrage that President Obama wants to make our troops suffer the burdens of cuts while protecting others. It’s unfair and completely goes against his popular rhetoric about everyone paying their fair share.” said Debbie Lee. “Our troops and their families already pay more than their fair share; they deserve to be taken care of for the sacrifices these brave men and women make. We demand that President Obama fix this bill so that our troops and their husbands, wives, and children aren’t the ones hurt.” concluded Lee. 

Obama cuts military health care benefits, leaves unionized civilians untouched - Human Events 
Bill Gertz at the Washington Free Beacon writes of a growing controversy in Congress and the Pentagon over the Obama administration’s latest brainstorm for cutting our defense budget:
The Obama administration’s proposed defense budget calls for military families and retirees to pay sharply more for their healthcare, while leaving unionized civilian defense workers’ benefits untouched. The proposal is causing a major rift within the Pentagon, according to U.S. officials. Several congressional aides suggested the move is designed to increase the enrollment in Obamacare’s state-run insurance exchanges.
The disparity in treatment between civilian and uniformed personnel is causing a backlash within the military that could undermine recruitment and retention.
The proposed increases in health care payments by service members, which must be approved by Congress, are part of the Pentagon’s $487 billion cut in spending. It seeks to save $1.8 billion from the Tricare medical system in the fiscal 2013 budget, and $12.9 billion by 2017.
    Military personnel have voiced some understandable concerns about this little scheme, which could “severely impact efforts to recruit and maintain a high-quality all-volunteer military force.”

Obama to cut health-care benefits for troops, but not unionized defense workers - Hot Air

Veterans and troops set to lose health benefits under Obama's budget 
 Retirees in the military health care program will face increases in their annual costs of up to 345 per cent 
Concern is sinking in over the long-term effects of President Barack Obama's proposed budget cuts to military health care spending. Critics say that by taking aim at the military health care program by adding additional fees and increasing required payments, the President is dishonoring troops and hurting the military's recruiting power.

The budget put forth by Mr Obama- which still needs to be approved by Congress before being enacted- would create $487billion in cuts over the next 10 years.

One of the biggest areas of contention is the increases of health care fees that specifically target military retirees by boosting their co-pay charges and deductibles. Some reports cite unidentified administration officials as saying that they hope that the increases would put pressure on the retirees to opt out of their veterans benefits and sign up for the program put in place by President Obama's controversial Affordable Care Act which was approved in 2010. 'Would you stay with a car insurance company that raised your premiums by 345 per cent in five years? Probably not,' an unidentified congressional aide told Fox News, hinting that their plan to get veterans to sign up with other insurers would work. The budget suggests that the annual premiums for the military health care program, called Tricare, would be raised by 30 to 78 per cent in the first year and then the individuals would be subjected to an additional 94 to 345 per cent increase.

Massachusetts School Serves “KKK” Chicken Tenders
 METHUEN, Mass. — School officials in a Massachusetts town are apologizing for sending home a lunch menu that listed KKK Chicken Tenders as an option.
About 6,500 students in four Methuen (muh-THOO’-in) schools went home with new menus Tuesday, a day after the original one mistakenly listed chicken seemingly in the style of the Ku Klux Klan.
Superintendent Judith Scannell tells The Eagle-Tribune  the menu was supposed to list KK Chicken Tenders, with the KK standing for a creatively spelled “Krispy, Krunchy,” but an employee mistakenly hit the “K” key one too many times.
Scannell apologized if anyone was offended. The food service director got one complaint.
A student pointed out to WCVB-TV that it there would’ve been no issue if officials just spelled the words correctly, with the letter C.
 Georgetown co-ed: Please pay for us to have sex … We’re going broke buying birth control - Hot Air
At a hearing of the House Democratic Steering and Policy Committee yesterday, a single witness — Georgetown law student and “reproductive rights activist” Sandra Fluke — told sympathetic policy-makers that the administration’s so-called contraception mandate should stand … because her peers are going broke buying birth control.
“Forty percent of the female students at Georgetown Law reported to us that they struggled financially as a result of this policy (Georgetown student insurance not covering contraception),” Fluke reported.
It costs a female student $3,000 to have protected sex over the course of her three-year stint in law school, according to her calculations.
“Without insurance coverage, contraception, as you know, can cost a woman over $3,000 during law school,” Fluke told the hearing.
Craig Bannister at did the math — and discovered that these co-eds, assuming they’re using the cheapest possible contraception, must be having unprotected sex about three times a day every day to incur that kind of expense. What Fluke is arguing, then, is that her fellow law students have a right to consequence-free sex whenever, wherever. Why, exactly, especially if it costs other people something? When I can’t pay for something, I do without it. Fortunately, in the case of contraception, women can make lifestyle choices that render it unnecessary.
More proof that college students are getting dumber and more and more selfish.
You want taxpayer dollars to subsidize your sexual activity, really!? Seriously!?
The thing is we have millions of parents raising these idiots, selfish tard kids and sending off the college.
What the hell do we expect!?  
 WOW!Registering Tim Tebow and Tom Brady to Vote in Minnesota

.To boost Obama's redistribution agenda, the OECD is pushing this crazy assertion that poverty is higher in the United States than in Greece, Hungary, Turkey, etc.

Socialist presidential candidate in France wants a 75% income tax rate on the evil rich.

Here’s an example of the self-proclaimed most transparent administration in history.

Looks like “hope” and “change” are making a comeback.

Do you remember the window factory where workers staged a sit-in three years ago?  Looks like that’s another green energy company having to fire workers.

According to the Government Accountability Agency's 2012 annual report, nearly every department of the Executive Branch has room for improvement on government waste.

A tax break for mustache?

How’s this for a government outrage: $750,000 of taxpayer money … for a new soccer field … in Guantanamo Bay.

 Exposé of elected leader creating firestorm - WND
 Local publisher's plan to delay project circumvented 
Word that a devastating exposé on Barack Obama’s Kenyan colleague, Prime Minister Raila Odinga, written by a former top aide might be published before elections this year is rocking the East African nation.

Nairobi’s Daily Nation newspaper published a report over the weekend that berated WND senior writer and author Jerome Corsi, who is working with the book’s author, Odinga critic Miguna Miguna.

Mr. Corsi is the author of the scurrilous right-wing treatise, ‘The Obama Nation’,” the Daily Nation report trumpeted. “He has made a career of feeding American racist and right-wing propaganda about President Barrack Obama and his Kenyan links.”

 WND recently reported that Miguna handed over to Corsi an 800-page manuscript of his book. It was scheduled to be published in Kenya this year until Miguna was told by his publisher that it would be delayed until 2013, after Odinga stands for election this year. Corsi said the delay appeared to be “government censorship.”

 The links between Obama and Odinga stretch back years. Obama, a fellow Luo tribe member, campaigned for Odinga in 2006 while Obama still was a U.S. senator.

 Obama helped Odinga into office in Kenya after the 2007 election, even though Odinga lost, in a power-sharing agreement to stop deadly rioting by Odinga’s followers.

Hundreds of Christians were killed in the attacks on rioting Muslim crowds. Corsi, who was deported from Kenya in 2008 while investigating Obama’s Kenyan roots, said he believes that Odinga worries his chances of being elected president are harmed if the book is published before the vote.

Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Obama Fans: Fool you once shame on you, fool you twice then you’re and idiot! - The 'honor' of being a food stamp president - Other links to Obama stuff...

Folks those of you who peep MNW from time to time already know I’m a moody slightly schizophrenic or better yet bi-polar dude; at least I’m honest about my frailties as most human beings are delusional regarding theirs.
How I feel and react to things are in direct correlation to stimuli I receive from the world around me. Much of what or why I post what I do tend to come from something I read or hear or something a friend, acquaintance, co-worker or even a perfect stranger may say to me or what I overheard.
I’m fascinated by psychology and one day I may just seek to obtain a degree in the field simply for self-gratification but mostly to better understand myself and the world around me.
I of course am a political junkie and that character trait or flaw depending on how you look at it has a lot to do with where I work and where and how I grew up.
As much disdain as I have for Obama as each day passes I continue to be intrigued by those who like and support him.
In addition to reading the stories I post here I read a lot of chat room conversations particularly material posted by Obama fans and while some days it makes me want to grind my teeth to the gums other days it make me laugh out loud at the seemingly pure unadulterated insanity that goes on in the minds of these people.

While punching out this post I came across this post at Right Wing News, funny how those of us on the right have the same thinking:
The column is called, Five Things Children Know That Liberals Have Forgotten. Here’s an excerpt from the column.
“Liberals love to think of themselves as intellectual and nuanced, but liberalism is incredibly simplistic. It’s nothing more than ‘childlike emotionalism applied to adult issues.’ Very seldom does any issue that doesn’t involve pandering to their supporters boil down at its core level to more than feeling ‘nice’ or ‘mean’ to liberals. This makes liberals ill equipped to deal with complex issues.” — John Hawkins, September 21, 2007
Liberals are actually worse than children, not just because it’s so appalling to see adults who view themselves as highly intelligent and sophisticated thinking like little kids, but because in some respects, left-wing thinking is inferior to that of children. There are things that five year olds all across this country know that liberal child-men are intellectually unable to comprehend.
Much of what I hear that comes out of the mouths of liberals is indeed borderline insanity and irrationality.
The acting like children comment is so dead on. This is why liberals seek to squash free speech when a conservative comes to a college campus. This is why liberals try so hard on sites like You Tube, Craigslist, message boards to flag or remove post that call out Democrats and liberalism.
I have never EVER wanted to remove a post, comments by someone with whom I disagreed with, flag a video, shout someone down while he is speaking, interrupt an event where someone with whom I disagreed with was speaking.
Liberals are the ones who get up at public events like the Oscars and chastise Republicans. Comedians who want a cheap laugh will still mention outdated political bullshit, Bush, Katrina the Reagan years.
I wrote a post after Obama had been in office for a bit and he was slowly fucking things up and comedians acted like a bunch of pussies because they were scared to comically admonish Obama’s clear incompetence.     
Ok back to my initial point...

I had a chance to engage a few Obama fans who at the outset thought I was an Obama fan of course due to my skin shading.
Because of where I work I have to be cool about engaging people in political discussions simple because it is a PR issue.
I’m a customer service guy in a sense I’m usually the one and only face of the facility where I work, just like any job you always want to put you best foot forward to leave people with a good impression.
Without going into immense detail I chatted up with a couple of individuals one a professor of history another a Poly Sci student and another an older lady retired who later admitted that she has little stomach for politics.
When I get the chance to stealthily throw in a dig or two at Obama fans I do so with good humor. Some of what I cover below is what I briefly talked about to each in particular Obama’s socialist connections.
All of course rejected the notion which was not a shock. I then mentioned Obama campaigning for his cousin Odinda in Kenya,  a member of the Orange Democratic Movement, a socialist party.
All not only rejected that bit of information I was taken aback at how steadfast they were in their rejection of this scurrilous tidbit of information was to them. As each were now on the defensive and citing that my information was obviously tainted and woefully misinformed I went to my old friend You Tube and played the video I have below.

Now folks I completely understood that my revealing this tidbit of information was not going to change their opinion of Obama nor cause them to waver in their support but it was their seemingly strong emotional response that slightly shocked me.
I have followed politics for a long time and while I have political favorites I have never devoted a single ounce of personal emotional attachment to any politician.
I liked Ronald Reagan and I believe he was a solid president and was the right man for the job at that particular moment in American history considering what a complete disaster Jimmy Carter was.
But liberals have this unusual response to being exposed to the truth. It was clear in each case that they almost had this “caught with their pants down” response as if they were almost embarrassed by the revelation.
I often thrown out the jab that liberals’ willingness to be ignorant is America’s greatest problem. Until individuals choose to become informed on the issues on their own hopefully without having to rely on the media to educate them, no matter how many of us on the right or even independents who are against Obama and his flawed policies we are seemingly wasting our time and effort.       

What people were ignorant of during the 2008 campaign...

Remember in 2008 There was a mystery regarding the millions donated to the Obama campaign especially in regards to illegal contributions, from here in the United States and from foreigners.

Remember when the RNC complained to the FEC alleging misconduct by the Obama campaign after an investigation revealed that half of the $400+ million donations to the Obama campaign came from “unreported sources” and that at least $2 million in donations have come from foreigners at the same time totally ignoring Obama’s past socialist ties.

Doug Ross’ posted an entry that was circulated on multiple blogs regarding the Obama campaign website  accepting contributions from foreigners without any proof of citizenship. 
The Obama Campaign’s Massive Credit Card Scandal
You know how ACORN registered thousands of bogus voters like Mickey Mouse and Daffy Duck? ACORN’s handlers at the Obama campaign seem to be accepting contributions from Mickey and Daffy too. It turns out that the Obama campaign’s crack team of fundraisers decided to turn off all security validation for credit-card donations. Want to enter the name Pedro Martinez when the credit-card belongs to Arnold Fizbin? Need to use the ZIP code 99999 when the card owner’s ZIP is 02154? No problem! The Obama campaign doesn’t care!
In order for this to occur, the “Address Verification System has to be specifically disabled to allow this fraud.”
Newsmax also published a piece Funny Money: 
President-elect Obama and his team smashed all fundraising records on the way to victory. Newsmax reveals how some of that all-important cash came from questionable even make-believe sources.

$426+ million that was raised by the Obama campaign came from “unreported” donations of $200 and under:
“The FEC breakdown of the Obama campaign has identified a staggering $222.7 million as coming from contributions of $200 or less. Only $39.6 million of that amount comes from donors the Obama campaign has identified.
It is the largest pool of unidentified money that has ever flooded into the U.S. election system, before or after the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reforms of 2002.”
Newsmax uncovered 60,000 donations to Obama that had originated from foreign sources while other investigations found how easy it is for non-citizens to donate using a credit card on the Obama campaign website. Not only can foreigners donate to Obama on his campaign website but it was discovered that the campaign website had disabled safeguards when entering credit card info enabling contributors to fill in the “donor” name other than the credit card holder. The New York Times blog reported that “fake” names were easily entered when submitting an contribution to Obama’s campaign.

Amazingly... or not... the media completely ignored, hence people remained ignorant.

Folks I understand that this is nothing new to politics.
In 1996 Al Gore and the Buddhist Temple fundraiser made the news:
“Vice President Al Gore’s visit to a Buddhist temple near Los Angeles in 1996 is the very symbol of campaign-finance chicanery, particularly illegal contributions from Asia. Gore tried to distance himself from the event by claiming at first that it was “community outreach.” Eventually he conceded that it was “finance related,” but he’s always said he didn’t know it was a fundraiser.”
According to Fortune Magazine, Gore had a longstanding relationship with Maria Hsia, a fundraiser who organized an event at the Hsi Lai Buddhist Temple in Hacienda Heights, California. The “event” was billed as Democratic fundraiser:
“Gore and Hsia got to know each other in the late 1980s, when Gore was worried about raising enough money for his 1990 Senate reelection. Hsia, an immigration consultant, was eager to contribute to politicians who could help her clients and associates. One associate was John Huang, who became notorious as an Asian fundraiser for the Democratic Party in 1996. Her clients would later include the Hsi Lai Temple, whose parent was the Fo Kuang Shan Buddhist order. In 1989, Gore was the sole U.S. Senator to accept Hsia’s entreaty to visit the temple’s Taiwan headquarters on a trip partly paid for by the order.”

From Salon:
“April 1996 Gore attends an event at the Hsi Lai Buddhist Temple in Los Angeles that nets the Democratic National Committee close to $65,000 from donors. In September 1997, a trio of Buddhist nuns from the temple admit in Senate testimony that the temple illegally reimbursed guests for their donations. Gore later denies knowing the gathering at the temple was a fundraiser, describing the event as “community outreach.”" 

The New York Times pointed out the nuns and Buddhists who gave cash contributions to Gore had “taken a vow of poverty” and that it is against the law to hold a political fundraiser in a “tax exempt religious institution”, never mind that the contributions where from foreigners.

I’m just curious does any of this sound familiar? If you happen to be an Obama sycophant, bootlicker, ass kisser, flunky or if you are simply ignorant or just don’t give a fuck does any of this sound familiar?
Oh wait let me spit out what all of you Obama fans will say. Either “Well, what about Bush?” or “All politicians do the same thing?” or if you’re black let me guess “White people have been getting away with criminal shit in politics since the founding of the country, why not let a brotha get away with a few things.” Am I close folks?    

Continuing to beat dead horse….

Remember: Obama campaigning in Kenya for his cousin, Odinga

$950,000 had been raised by Obama's fundraisers for his cousin in Kenya, rebel leader Raila Odinga, and that Obama had campaigned for his cousin who was running for President:
“In August and September 2006, Senator Barack Obama traveled to South Africa, Chad, Djibouti, Ethiopia, Chad and Kenya as a congressional delegation of one Codel Obama.

 While in Kenya, Obama consistently appeared at the side of fellow Luo Raila Odinga who was running for President. Because of his African heritage, Obama was treated as a virtual Head of State in Kenya while campaigning with Odinga.
Odinga, a member of the Luo Tribe, felt he was “robbed” when he lost an election to Kenya’s president, Mwai Kibaki. Ironically, Odinga’s party is the Orange Democratic Movement, a socialist party, while many Americans are unaware that Obama was once a member of the Socialist New Party when he ran for Illinois Senate.

For those who want to check out more go here: 

Obama and the New Party - by Erick Erickson 06/10/2008

Two weeks ago at RedState, we documented Obama’s 1996 endorsement by the New Party.  A review of the New Party establishes that not only was the party an amalgamation of far left groups, but Barack Obama knew that when he sought the party’s endorsement.
Most of the New Party’s history has been lost in the digital age. It was established in 1992 and started to die out in 1998, well before Google and the modern web were established. But through lengthy searches of the Nexis archive and microfilm at the local university library, I’ve been able to piece this together.
The New Party was established in 1992 “by union activist Sandy Pope and University of Wisconsin professor Joel Rogers,” USA Today reported on November 16, 1992. The paper wrote that the new party was “self-described [as] ‘socialist democratic.’”
The seeds, however, had been sown all the way back in 1988. Quoting John Nichols in the March 22, 1998 issue of In These Times, “The roots of the New Party go back to the aftermath of Jesse Jackson’s run for president in 1988. At that time, Dan Cantor, who had served as labor coordinator for the Jackson campaign, and University of Wisconsin sociology professor Joel Rogers began talking about how to formulate an alternative between the increasingly indistinguishable Democratic-Republican monolith.”
Joel Rogers sought to use the idea of “fusion” as a way to get the New Party into power.
Fusion is a pretty simple concept. A candidate could run as both a Democrat and a New Party member to signal the candidate was, in fact, a left-leaning candidate, or at least not a center-left DLC type candidate. If the candidate -- let’s call him Barack Obama -- received only 500 votes in the Democratic Party against another candidate who received 1000 votes, Obama would clearly not be the nominee. But, if Obama also received 600 votes from the New Party, Obama’s New Party votes and Democratic votes would be fused. He would be the Democratic nominee with 1100 votes.

Or this:

THE EVIDENCE IS CLEAR -- Obama WAS member of Socialist New Party

Back to Obama's cousin... Below is a video showing Obama campaigning for Odinga in Kenya in 2006 while on the “taxpayers” dime. Charges of genocide were leveled at Odinga after members of his Luo tribe rioted, killing rival villagers and burned Christian churches after Odinga lost the election.
Politico found where the Washington Times had reported Obama’s trip, paid for by American taxpayers, and how Obama had used his slogan of “Change”:
“Mr. Odinga and Mr. Obama were nearly inseparable throughout Mr. Obama’s six-day stay. The two traveled together throughout Kenya and Mr. Obama spoke on behalf of Mr. Odinga at numerous rallies. In contrast, Mr. Obama had only criticism for Kibaki. He lashed out against the Kenyan government shortly after meeting with the president on Aug. 25. “The [Kenyan] people have to suffer over corruption perpetrated by government officials,” Mr. Obama announced.
“Kenyans are now yearning for change,” he declared. The intent of Mr. Obama’s remarks and actions was transparent to Kenyans – he was firmly behind Mr. Odinga.”

These are just a couple of a multitude of issues concerning Obama that individuals like those mentioned above are completely oblivious too.
And we also have the fact that Obama STILL has yet to release any of his papers from his former days at Harvard, Occidental, and Columbia as a college student.

Since the media still won't report on some of the issues described above even some of my co-workers and acquaintances some of the most politically connected and astute people in the country has never heard that   Obama was a member in the Socialist New Party when he ran for Illinois State Senate,  on Obama's 2006 trip to Kenya on the taxpayers dime campaigning for his socialist cousin Odinga, the head of a socialist party in Kenya, and much of the monies that poured into his presidential campaign much of that from non-American citizens living overseas.

To you Obama sycophant, bootlicker, ass kisser, flunkies I ask, does this shit matter to you and if not why?

The 'honor' of being a food stamp president - Boortz  
On the one hand, it is racist for Newt Gingrich to call Barack Obama a food stamp president.  On the other hand, Jesse Jackson, the Sloganmaster, says “it’s an honor to be a food stamp president.”  Seriously!  Here’s the quote from race-pimp Jesse Jackson:
“Say, it’s an honor to be a food stamp president. Food stamps feed the hungry. Food stamps save the children. Food stamps help the farmer. Food stamps help the truck driver. Food stamps help the warehouse. Food stamps help the store. Food stamps hire people and feed people. Food stamps save people from starvation and malnutrition,” says Jackson. “Whenever you attack feeding the hungry, you undermine the moral authority of our faith. Give President Barack Obama a big hand. Show your love. Show your appreciation.”
When you think about this it makes perfect sense.  Democrat power is built on dependency.  As more people become dependent on government Democrats grow stronger; as more people become self-reliant Democrats grow weaker.  Wouldn’t that make you proud to be a Democrat?

White House Won’t Release Obama’s 3 PAGE APOLOGY LETTER to Hamid Karzai - Gateway Pundit

Dear Ruler’s approval ratings are dropping among nearly every demographic.

Is the imperial federal government via the IRS attempting to intimidate local tea parties?

America can't afford four more years of trying to turn a community organizer into a president. They'd be better off trying to turn pond scum into fuel.

Here’s a list of 10 ways Obama would reduce gas prices right now.

Who is to blame for high gas prices?  According to the Obama campaign, the Koch brothers.

Now that Obama is in the White House, libs and proggies are trying to assert that the spike in gas prices is not really affected by the President's actions. Four years ago they had a very different take.

Here’s the incomparable Thomas Sowell vs the Occutards and Caesar Obammus.

In a USA TODAY/Gallup Poll of the nation's dozen top battleground states, a clear majority of registered voters call ObamaCare "a bad thing" and support its repeal.

Obamacare’s pre-existing condition plan is costing twice as much per enrollee as originally estimated … but we had to pass the bill to find out what’s in it, right?

Here comes Barack Obama’s 3am phone call.

How long before our welfare state follows the European model into bankruptcy?  We may already be there.

Monday, February 27, 2012

Barack Obama’s 2008 Energy Plan - Obama Campaign’s Latest Creepy Email - ACORN V: The New Left’s Push to Take Over America - In case you missed it or ignored in 2008 ACORN: The Seedy Side of Obama’s Radical Past - The Community Organizer’s Collectivist Vision - Mike Flynn Obama Campaign Tries Intimidation to Boost Fundraising - Obama Plays Race Card, Calls on Churches to Support Campaign - I Hope like hell the GOP has a Brokered Convention

Barack Obama’s 2008 Energy Plan- Via American Freedom

 View document on Scribd
On page 6 you can see where he did not fulfill his “promise” on allowing the pipeline so as to create thousands of new jobs.
On page 2 it lists “Short Term Solutions”
Notice how it says “SWAP” light and heavy crude from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR).  ”He supports releasing light oil from the SPR now and replacing it later with heavier crude more suited to our long-term needs.”
I guarantee you that he will tap into the Strategic Petroleum Reserve before the election in November to make it appear as though gas prices are going down.  He has no intention of EVER replacing our SPR with what he took out.  Since when does Obama know what is best for all of US?
 Obama, the politics of the SPR and energy (lack of) exploration! -

also check out... 
 Obama Campaign’s Latest Creepy Email 02/25/12

Obama Campaign Tries Intimidation to Boost Fundraising - Big Government
 Despite the herculean efforts of the national media, President Obama’s reelection campaign continues to fall short of its groundbreaking “Hope and Change” campaign in 2008. In January, its fundraising haul actually fell below the level raised in January 2008, when Obama was a first-term Senator running against the Democrat establishment’s favorite candidate.  They’ve resorted to raffling off dinner with the President, but eventually had to cut the price of raffle tickets from $5 to $1. Now, it seems, the Obama campaign has decided to resort to SEIU-style intimidation to fill its campaign coffers.
  Obama Plays Race Card, Calls on Churches to Support Campaign

Oops! “Marxists/Socialists/Communists For Obama” On Campaign Website - Ironic Surrealism

 ACORN V: The New Left’s Push to Take Over America - Rogue Government 
 Everything we know about Obama’s connections to the left’s voter fraud army ACORN/Project Vote suggests we can expect the November 2012 elections to be the height of electoral chicanery.  The 1960s radicals who staff his administration will have no reservations about steering America hard left, even if that means driving the country into a ravine.
The hard left will have nothing to lose going for America’s throat, seeing that the administration has been largely unaccountable for its illegal and anti-constitutional actions the last three years. That the “Democrat” Party is now averse to ensuring free and fair elections only reveals what a corrupt, undemocratic, and power-lustful machine it has become.
and this... in case you missed it or ignored in 2008

ACORN IV: The Seedy Side of Obama’s Radical Past

The left-wing group formerly known as ACORN was an extremely corrupt cohort of community organizers who used Alinskyite“ends justify the means” tactics to game elections for radical politicians while undermining the capitalist economy. Despite the disinformation, Barack Obama was more than just a lawyer and grant distributor for ACORN, he was a field general who helped oversee the training of the outfit’s voter fraud army.

The Community Organizer’s Collectivist Vision - White House Dosser
I want you to take a look at something President Obama said during a fundraiser last week in SanFrancisco. It’s been gaining some notice as a vision for America that is not historically recognizable.
Because in the United States of America, we are greater together than we are on our own  (Applause). We’re better off when we keep that basic American promise that if you work hard, you can do well — you can raise a family, you can own a home, send your kids to college, put a little away for retirement — and that that promise is open to everybody.  If you’re born into tough circumstances, we’re going to give you ladders to climb up into that middle class.  And if you’re in that middle class, then we’re going to make sure that you’ve got the tools to, even in a changing world, have some security and some stability in your life.
That’s what we’re fighting for.  That’s the choice in this election.
Actually, this is not a vision for America. This is a vision for the Soviet Union.

 Morning Bell: Obama Doctrine Failure

Winter Gas Prices Reach All-Time High

Obamacare: Pay No Attention to Mandate Behind Curtain of Spin

Thousands More Oppose Obamacare Mandate’s Religious Liberty Violations

Obama Doctrine Leaves World Less Safe

Jesus this dude is a moron!
Santorum: Separation Of Church And State 'Makes Me Want To Throw Up' 

 This is why I Hope like hell the GOP has a Brokered Convention... but I understand the reality...
(link) The volatile Republican presidential contest has provoked feverish talk in the media and the blogosphere about a brokered or contested convention in late August, when 2,286 Republican delegates gather in Tampa, Fla. Here's how those scenarios would unfold. A brokered convention would see a new candidate—someone other than Newt Gingrich, Ron Paul, Mitt Romney or Rick Santorum—enter the remaining primaries or parachute in during the convention (if no existing candidate has secured a majority of delegates). In backroom deals, either based partly on the strength of his late primary performances or only on the discretion of party leaders, he would become the nominee. A contested convention, on the other hand, would see no dark horse enter but none of the existing candidates arrive in Tampa with a 1,144 majority of delegates. Lots of wheeling and dealing would ensue, and after several ballots a nominee would emerge from the four current candidates. Is either scenario likely? Let's put it this way: The odds are greater that there's life on Pluto than that the GOP has a brokered convention. And while there's a better chance of a contested convention, it's still highly unlikely.

This means that Hussein Obama will win in November

 I know this sounds crazy and it pisses me off to say but I will in no way vote for any of the candidates in the GOP field. There is no excuse for the GOP to field such a pathetic weak ass field of candidates particularly since anyone with a fucking brain knew idiot ass Obama was going to fuck shit up.
His background, his alliances and associations and what he himself has said publically… anyone with a fucking brain would know his presidency was going to be a disaster apparently except for the GOP!

 I wrote a piece the Sarah Palin could not be elected president basically because she chose to go Hollywood instead of becoming a serious political figure. Right now I am so angry at her for doing some of the stupid shit she did starting with leaving the governor’s post and then go on speaking tours charging shit loads of money for speeches. What happens in the next four years is squarely on the shoulders of the GOP. As I said before the day Obama won the election in 08 the GOP should have been cultivating the next candidate to run against him.
 The GOP’s lack of foresight, planning and execution is the reason Obama seemingly has a clear path to the White House again. We can blame liberals for their deception, we can blame the media for being biased, we can chastise the voting public for being ignorant, and we can even blame black folks for their inexplicable blind loyalty towards a man who has clearly screwed them over.
But make no mistake when Obama is declared the winner on election night in November it will be the GOP establishments’ epic failure that should be blamed for this moron getting four more years to further screw the country.

 Geller Exclusive in the Daily Caller: Hundreds of threats for assault victim in case dismissed by Quran-minded judge - Atlas Shrugs

Friday, February 24, 2012

Correcting the Record: Liberals willingness to be ignorant… Five Half-Truths From Obama on Higher Gas Prices - Most ever could get hit by $5 gas - Why Obama's 'All of the Above' Energy Policy Won't Ease Pain at the Pump - 2005 VIDEO: Watch Democrat Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz Attack Bush And Republicans Over High Gas Prices - Remember: Maxine Waters & Nationalizing Oil - US Judge rules Muslims have a right to assault people who offend them

 Correcting the Record: Five Half-Truths From Obama on Higher Gas Prices - Heritage

Forgive me folks I’m again a little irritated, this is why you need to avoid speaking about politics with certain people. I’m going to keep repeating this until I no longer have to. I don’t give a shit who is president; I don’t give a shit about what political party the president belongs too. What I care about are results and whether or not the president puts the best interest of his country over the interest of his party.

 Barrack Hussein Obama not only puts the interest of the country and its people below his party and his donors he does openly he does not even hide it because he knows that the majority of the people who support him and donate money to him don’t care about facts, are not grounded in reality, choose to remain ignorant and folks I’m not taking about people who are stupid or illiterate. I’m taking in many cases about people who are college educated, seemingly reasonable people, nice people, honest and many hard working people.

 Take this video below, after listening to part of his speech yesterday I mentioned some of the things Obama himself said that was posted via videos on the old blog Naked Emperor News to some Obama fans and a couple of young mind numb liberals. Videos where Obama basically said he preferred higher gas prices to be more in line with the cost of gas in Europe. I’ve mentioned these videos to three people, played the videos for them and ALL still did not believe it, thought the video were faked and the GOP made it all up.

I sent them articles linking Obama’s connection to Soros and his African Oil interests.
and this - Obama destroys America, Destroys Jobs, George Soros, Oil…
even the older stuff: Educate Yourself: Do Not Allow Obama A Second Term!

Liberals ignore the truth; they ignore reality, folks facts don’t matter to liberals, in essence putting Obama’s interest over that of the country. So the question is why do we (those of us who actually read, study, write, rant and rave) bother paying attention to this shit? I find it amazing that in a time where we have so much access to information resources, I-pads, I-touches, I-phones, countless websites, blogs, TV news resources, You Tube and mutherfuckers like Obama can stand up read from a teleprompter lie after lie and do it with such confidence and conviction knowing he can say whatever the fuck he wants and lie through his teeth and be confident in the fact that the people who support him will swallow regurgitate, rinse and repeat every or ultimately forget and ignore every lie. I wish I understood the psychology of what ultimately gets people to ignore reality, cast aside the obvious, process and accept the seemingly illogical.

During a speech on gas prices the President tried to dodge responsibility for the pain Americans are feeling at the pump. But the President and his Administration have repeatedly stated that they want higher energy prices. They want to use the pressure of higher energy costs as an excuse to force their green energy boondoggle on Americans.

During a speech on gas prices Thursday in Miami, the President tried to dodge responsibility for the pain Americans are feeling at the pump. Recognizing the trouble these higher prices are causing Americans, the President tried hard to demonstrate his concern over higher prices.

But as the video above shows, the President and his Administration have repeatedly stated that they want higher energy prices. They want to use the pressure of higher energy costs as an excuse to force their green energy boondoggle on Americans.

In a new report, Heritage’s Nick Loris breaks down five half-truths in the President’s speech:

Half-truth #1: Oil production is the highest it has been in eight years. The increased production of oil and gas in the U.S. is largely a product of increased production on private land. The Administration could have encouraged much bigger gains by providing access to federal land.

Half-truth #2: Increasing oil production takes too long and would not impact the market for at least a decade. The sooner we make investments in domestic energy, the sooner those benefits will be realized. And with some serious reforms, some of this oil can reach the market in much less than a decade.

Half-truth #3: Oil is not enough. America has only 2 percent of the world’s oil reserves. President Obama frequently uses this number to push federal investments in alternative sources of energy that cannot stand the test of the market. The reality is that he uses this number deceptively.

Half-truth #4: Oil is not enough. The country needs an “all-of-the-above” approach to reduce its dependence on oil. While a familiar refrain from the President, it is a line that too often translates into wasteful subsidies for pet energy projects. A market-based strategy is the only all-of-the-above approach.

Half-truth #5: Speculators are driving up the price of gas, and they need to be reined in. While the President tries to blame the market, he ignores the power of supply and demand. By removing roadblocks to domestic energy production, the President can ensure that there is a healthy supply of American energy on the market, keeping prices competitive.

Why Obama's 'All of the Above' Energy Policy Won't Ease Pain at the Pump

Most ever could get hit by $5 gas

As Americans Suffer and Gas Prices Climb… Obama Mocks Drilling For Oil (Video)- Gateway Pundit

Could High Gas Prices Hurt Obama's Reelection Campaign?

Gasoline Prices Are Not Rising, the Dollar Is Falling - Forbes
Panic is in the air as gasoline prices move above $4.00 per gallon. Politicians and pundits are rounding up the usual suspects, looking for someone or something to blame for this latest outrage to middle class family budgets. In a rare display of bipartisanship, President Obama and Speaker of the House John Boehner are both wringing their hands over the prospect of seeing their newly extended Social Security tax cut gobbled up by rising gasoline costs.

Unfortunately, the talking heads that are trying to explain the reasons for high oil prices are missing one tiny detail. Oil prices aren’t high right now. In fact, they are unusually low. Gasoline prices would have to rise by another $0.65 to $0.75 per gallon from where they are now just to be “normal”. And, because gasoline prices are low right now, it is very likely that they are going to go up more—perhaps a lot more.
 Obama Mocks Drilling For Oil – Pushes Green Algae Pond Scum Instead - Gateway Pundit

 2005 VIDEO: Watch Democrat Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz Attack Bush And Republicans Over High Gas Prices - Via American Glob

Oh did y'all forget this...
Other stuff

Videos: Obama’s 2008 campaign fueled by rising gas prices - Hot Air 
 Andrew Kaczynski must be Barack Obama’s worst nightmare.  While he and Nancy Pelosi try to find scapegoats for rapidly-rising gas prices, the BuzzFeed researcher is making Obama eat his own words … from 2008.  When Obama ran for President, he attacked George Bush and John McCain for increased fuel costs and promised an end to reliance on foreign oil in order to bring prices back down.

According to the ObamaMedia, what fuels the opposition to Obama? "Persistent racial animosity!" Gotta use the race card every chance they get.

The ObamaMedia will come up with any excuse so as to shield Obama from criticism of his outrageous spending habits.

Democrats are buying ObamaMedia coverage. Literally.

US Judge rules Muslims have a right to assault people who offend them - Human Events
People who are concerned about the spread of Muslim sharia law into American jurisprudence used to be dismissed as alarmists.  That won’t happen again for a while, thanks to a Pennsylvania judge who just dismissed assault charges against a Muslim who was videotaped attacking a man dressed as “Zombie Muhammad” during a Halloween parade. 
The judge, who is a Muslim, didn’t even care to see the videotape, because the assault was entirely justified under sharia law, so the First Amendment doesn’t apply.  In fact, the beaten Zombie Muhammad should just be thankful he wasn’t killed, because that’s what would have happened in a Muslim country.
The astonishing details, from Opposing Views:

The Pennsylvania State Director of American Atheists, Inc., Mr. Ernest Perce V., was assaulted by a Muslim while participating in a Halloween parade. Along with a Zombie Pope, Ernest was costumed as Zombie Muhammad. The assault was caught on video, the Muslim man admitted to his crime and charges were filed in what should have been an open-and-shut case. That’s not what happened, though.
The defendant is an immigrant and claims he did not know his actions were illegal, or that it was legal in this country to represent Muhammad in any form. To add insult to injury, he also testified that his 9 year old son was present, and the man said he felt he needed to show his young son that he was willing to fight for his Prophet. 

Muslim judge Mark Martin ruled in favor of the assailant… and insulted the defendant for good measure.

Wednesday, February 22, 2012

'There are forces of evil in the world': Santorum defends his Satan warning... by comparing himself to Reagan REALLY!? SERIOUSLY!? - - Black Hollywood Insanity! Some Sounds Off On Obama And The Presidential Race - What Was Predicted 3 Years Ago is NOW HERE! OBAMA EXPOSED! - Links to Obama's Muslim ties (in case you ignored it during the 2008 campaign) - Rising gas prices .. we were warned (IN CASE YOU IGNORED THIS TOO DURING THE 2008 CAMPAIGN!) - Crazy Bitch White House Senior Advisor: Unemployment Stimulates the Economy

'There are forces of evil in the world': Santorum defends his Satan warning... by comparing himself to Reagan - Daily Mail UK
Rick Santorum has sought to deflect controversy over a 2008 speech in which he said that "Satan has set his sights on the United States" by drawing a parallel with Ronald Reagan branding the Soviet Union an "evil empire".
Speaking at a rally in Phoenix, Arizona, the former US Senator for Pennsylvania told an anecdote about Lech Walesa and stating that "yes there are there are forces of evil in the world". The former Solidarity leader in Poland, he said, had recalled the days when "America would stand up and call evil by its name".
Santorum said: "Ronald Reagan did that. Ronald Reagan called the Soviet Union an evil empire and the media went would how dare you how dare you ascribe terms like good and evil to regimes.
"Because Ronald Reagan told the truth. He didn't sugarcoat it. He went out and called it the way it was. He went out and promoted the values of our country."
His response is unlikely to convince critics of his outspoken religiosity, however, because Reagan was talking about foreign policy and a Cold War foe while Santorum appeared to be talking about a spiritual threat.Self-comparisons with Reagan, a Republican demi-god, are, moreover, often politically risky, as Newt Gingrich has found out.In 1983, Reagan rejected the advice of aides who urged him not to call the Soviet Union an "evil empire", delivering a speech to the National Association of Evangelicals in Orlando, Florida that is now seen as a defining moment in the demise of the USSR and the end of the Cold War.Before Santorum spoke in Phoenix, Rush Limbaugh, the conservative talk show host, said that publication of excerpts from the speech were "part of the predictable attempt to impugn Santorum as an absolute religious nut and wacko". But he added that Santorum "will have to deal with it, he'll have to answer it".In the speech to students at Ave Maria University in south-west Florida in August 2008, Mr Santorum, a devout Roman Catholic and father of seven, said that "Satan has his sights on the United States of America".
And those movers and shakers in the GOP wonder why some of us right leaning blogger types have such a pessimistic view of the party and the countries chances of getting rid of this idiot president.
Every time this dude (Santorum) opens his mouth he becomes another 30 second spot for the Democratic Party and why the GOP continues to have a huge image problem.
Just in case anyone of any significance in the GOP happens to accidentally find my humble little blog catch a fucking clue: I don’t want to hear about Satan, I don’t want to hear about a bunch of religious dogma bullshit, I don’t want to hear about abortion, I don’t want to hear about contraceptives… I want to hear how the GOP nominee is going to keep this country from going broke; I want to hear how the GOP nominee is going to curb our debt.
The GOP needs to convey a message to the public that they are not the alternative, they are the imperative. 
To get rid of this disastrous president the GOP develop a bold vision for America. The GOP MUST be a stark, positive and optimistic contrast to the president.  

Any successful presidential campaign run well oiled, calculated, and visionary campaigns. Any polished candidate will always make people want to vote for them. They create passion in the electorate. Their messaging resonated with people… ALL PEOPLE! Quality candidates even make those who have no intension of voting for them will still leave those voters impressed with them.
This is the second consecutive election cycle the GOP fails to field such a candidate and as a result the GOP loses and more importantly America loses.
 Satan Vs. Santorum - Right Wing News
 He’s a little too comfortable with big government and although he can come across like a philosopher/religious historian when he’s on top of his game, he’s not exactly teeming with charisma and he often comes across as preachy. Politicians can talk about social issues and honestly, voters like that more than most political junkies realize. Most voters assume that politicians are lying sacks of crap with the morals of professional con men, which is why someone who comes across as genuine about his religious beliefs, which Santorum certainly is, can have some appeal. Jimmy Carter, for example, was a pretty awful President, but people liked him personally and wanted to vote for him because they believed he was a good man. Rick Santorum is a genuinely good and decent man which is something you can say about very few politicians.
 Black Hollywood Sounds Off On Obama And The Presidential Race

If you wonder why black folks tend to be clueless when it comes to politics listen to this panel of Black Hollywood sycophants kissing Obama’s idiot ass. I honestly wonder what presidency these people are referring too. I tell anyone who is willing to listen this: I basically don’t have a dog in the race meaning I’ve never been an individual who would put my faith in ANY elected official.
No one president, congressman, senator, mayor whatever is going to drive the direction of my life. All I want out of my president is to simply get the fuck out of the way and allow our nation to function independent of any idealistic nonsense, political social engineering or governmental hand jobs for the masses.
 This is precisely why I have such disdain for arrogant fuck liberal Democrats, this is my main issue with Obama. If all is well, the economy is working, people are working all is quiet out of Washington I don’t have a beef with Obama, why would I, what purpose would it serve to spend all day trying to come up with ways to discredit this president is all is indeed well.

But the flip side are these idiot ass Negros in the video, with money, few if any worries an inflated sense of self with the audacity to tell their clueless Negro audience oh don’t worry that the hope he promised was all a pipe dream, don’t worry that you are losing your homes, don’t worry you have been unemployed for months on end, don’t worry that you can’t afford to drive your car, or feed your kids because ‘Obama’s got you.” How can these jackass celebrities look themselves in the mirror and stump for such a disastrous president?
Oh I forgot, he’s black and that invitation to the Oval Office Hennessy and cheese funk off party is in the mail.
I will never cease to be amazed that yours truly and the few right thinking black folks we will always be referred to as the “sellouts” or Uncle Tom’s but when black entertainers and political flunkies distort the truth about what is really going on in America and even worse when the black political leadership lie, cheat and steal from their own constituents this behavior is acceptable.
This is why I will say again, the best saying my father ever conveyed to me:
 “just because someone shares the same skin color as you does not make them automatically part of your team and certainly does not make them your brotha. An individual’s integrity and character are far more important than skin color”
What Was Predicted 3 Years Ago is NOW HERE! OBAMA EXPOSED! Pt 1 - Via American Freedom

Part 2

Links to Obama's Muslim ties - Free Republic

Just so y’all don’t get it twisted, I never was one who focus solely on the “Obama is a Muslim” issue because (and unfortunately for me) I thought people (especially white people) would follow a bit of common sense and do their homework. I expect black people to remain ignorant because they don’t typically give a fuck about real world shit, Hell frankly Jews are any brighter either as the article I linked to the other day talked about: Why Most Jews Don’t Vote GOP.
However you would think that if you put all of Obama’s history in perspective it would at the very least send up red flags to rational minds. Fooled the hell out of me, but then again you still have folks who still think OJ was innocent and Casey Anthony was misunderstood. People all I do here is read what interests me regardless of source and political leanings and link to what I think might interest you. If you think its crap, then simply ignore. We all either choose to utilize our God given gut instincts or ignore them at our own peril. I’m just an aggregator killing time throughout the day while doing my job.

Rising gas prices .. we were warned - Boortz 
This is Amazing to me.  Before the election we hear from Obama’s folks that the goal will be to increase gas prices.  Obama becomes president when gas averages $1.83 per gallon.  We’re nearing $4.00 a gallon now.  All of this and the media is basically silent as to Obama’s stated goals and today’s reality?  Go figure. 
Keep in mind also that Barack Obama also said flat-out that he wanted to bankrupt the coal industry by using government cap and trade policies to make coal a more expensive energy option.  Instead, under Obama’s command economy, he would invest the money generated from cap and trade into solar, wind, biodiesel and other alternative energy approaches.  But thanks to your tax dollars, Obama got an early start investing in these alternative energies, without the lucrative payout of cap and trade … Solyndra’s $500 million failure ring a bell?
And while we are talking energy policy, it seems as though the Obama administration has actually taken to re-writing its own history on energy policy.  Yesterday in a White House press briefingchief dogwasher Jay Carney actually said: "In terms of Keystone, as you all know, the history here is pretty clear. And the fact is because Republicans decided to play political with Keystone, their action essentially forced the administration to deny the permit process because they insisted on a time frame in which it was impossible to completely approve the pipeline."
When a liberal says “the history is clear,” you know they are getting ready to muddy up history.  That’s right … blame the Republicans … can’t say we didn’t see that one coming!  I’ve given you these facts before, but let’s take a look at the truth about this pipeline, rather than the Obama administrations lame excuses and bent recollection …
The Keystone pipeline has been under review by the State Department since 2008.  Even by federal standards, four years is a long time for a project like this to be in limbo.  You can think of it this way: The Obama administration complained about a 60-day deadline, but in reality it has now had 1,217 days to make a decision.
So that puts this asinine “arbitrary deadline” argument to bed.  Now on to the next one … its environmental impact.
The company that wanted to build the pipeline, TransCanada, spent a full three years and $1.9 billion studying the environmental impact of this project.  The State Department itself has already done an entire Environmental Impact Statement.  Why they need another one, or why Obama needed more time to process all of this is beyond me.
Leave this topic with one last thought.  If you goal is to cripple a free market economy – to destroy capitalism – engineering an increase in gas prices is sure one way to go.
 Crazy Bitch White House Senior Advisor: Unemployment Stimulates the Economy

Tuesday, February 21, 2012

Affirmative Action Presidency, Blame Clueless White People (and GOP) for Excusing/Ignoring Obama’s Incompetence! - Is Obama’s America God’s Country? - Is Media Matters Obama's Watergate? 18 Statistics That Prove That The Economy Has Not Improved Since Barack Obama Became President - Climate scientist admits to defrauding the Heartland Institute

Is Obama’s America God’s Country? 
The political beliefs of Barack Obama, said Rick Santorum last week, come out of “some phony theology. … Not a theology based on the Bible, a different theology, but no less a theology.”
Given the opportunity on “Face the Nation” to amend his remarks, Santorum declined the offer and plunged on:
“I don’t question the president’s faith. I’ve repeatedly said that I believe the president is a Christian. He says he is a Christian. I am talking about his worldview and the way he approaches problems in this country. … They’re different than how most people do in America.”
Obama’s surrogates on the Sunday shows charged Santorum with questioning the president’s faith.
Not exactly. What Santorum is saying is that in the struggle for the soul of America, though Obama may profess to be, and may be, a Christian, he is leading the anti-Christian forces of what Pope Benedict XVI has called “radical secularism.”
In Plano, Texas, last week, Santorum was even more explicit:
“They (the Obamaites) are taking faith and crushing it. Why? Why? When you marginalize faith in America, when you remove the pillar of God-given rights, then what’s left is the French Revolution. … What’s left in France became the guillotine.
“Ladies and gentlemen, we’re a long way from that, but if we … follow the path of President Obama and his overt hostility to faith in America, then we are headed down that road.”


 18 Statistics That Prove That The Economy Has Not Improved Since Barack Obama Became President - Mr. Conservative 

#1 Today there are 88 million working age Americans that are not employed and that are not looking for employment.  That is an all-time record high.

#2 When Barack Obama was elected, the percentage of unemployed Americans that had been out of work for more than 52 weeks was less than 15%.  Today, it is above 30%.

#3 There are 1.2 million fewer jobs in America today than there were when Barack Obama was inaugurated.

#4 When Barack Obama first took office, the number of “long-term unemployed workers” in the United States was approximately 2.6 million.  Today, that number is sitting at 5.6 million.

#5 The average duration of unemployment in the United States is hovering close to an all-time record high.

#6 During the Obama administration, worker health insurance costs have risen by 23 percent.

#7 Since Barack Obama has been president, the average price of a gallon of gasoline in the United States has increased by 90 percent.

#8 Since Barack Obama has been president, home values in the United States have declined by another 13 percent.

 The Cost of President Obama's Keystone XL Dithering 
Politics gets in the way of the TransCanada project that would have brought jobs and energy

  Gas prices - Boortz 
Surely you’ve noticed the gas prices going up.  Interesting, isn’t it?  Our capitalist system is under attack.  Freedoms are disappearing.  America is sliding backwards on the scale of economic freedom.  Dependence on government is increasing.  Bitterness between income levels – classes, if you will – is on the rise.  We’re on the verge of pure socialized medicine in the US.  It’s only a matter of time.  Businesses are passing on expansion plans due to ObamaCare and government regulation.  Our debt is rising, interest payments on that debt are nearing $10 billion per week … that’s right, $10 billion dollars every week, and heading to $22 billion per week in just ten years.  Every year our government goes well over $1 trillion dollars into additional debt, with no end in sight.
All of these problems … and more, and what does it take to get the American people agitated and complaining?  Gas prices.  That’s it --- gas prices.  A young couple can have a baby and be more concerned about the cost of the gas it will take to get that infant home from the hospital than they are about the fact that their little bundle of joy is saddled with over $100,000 in debt as soon as the first cry is heard. 
If gas prices go up $1.50 a gallon that would cost a family an extra $125 on a 1,500 mile vacation round trip.  I’m sure they would have something better to spend the $125 on than gasoline, but when you consider the other problems we’re facing here, this price of gas is not that big a deal.
So .. can we just suck it up on gas prices right now?  Let’s spend all that time and effort trying to do something about removing our anti-American president from office and getting government off our backs – and off the back of the American economy. 

You see folks my take on this is I blame the GOP far more than I blame Obama. Why? Because anyone paying attention after this idiot bastard got elected knew he was going to fuck everything up. High gas prices, hyperinflation, rising food prices a socialistic agenda, record breaking unemployment anyone with any fucking common sense knew Obama would fuck shit up and now some of us (especially you idiot Obama fans) are shocked that the floor is eroding from under our feet!?

The day this man was elected the brain trust of the GOP (if there is even such a thing) should have been planning to groom a decent candidate to run against this idiot during this election cycle.
When Rush said “I hope he fails” that was the warning cry to folks to start paying attention to hope and pray that he would not be able to enact much of his agenda.

But nooooooo! Most American’s sat on their asses and ignored his blatant stupidity all because they wanted to give a Negro a chance at running the country, who care that he ran it into the ground.
I remember reading the following shortly after election day and I wondered about the same thing:
Years from now, historians may regard the 2008 election of Barack Obama as an inscrutable and disturbing phenomenon, a baffling breed of mass hysteria akin perhaps to the witch craze of the Middle Ages.  How, they will wonder, did a man so devoid of professional accomplishment beguile so many into thinking he could manage the world's largest economy, direct the world's most powerful military, execute the world's most consequential job?
Imagine a future historian examining Obama's pre-presidential life: ushered into and through the Ivy League despite unremarkable grades and test scores along the way; a cushy non-job as a "community organizer"; a brief career as a state legislator devoid of legislative achievement (and in fact nearly devoid of his attention, so often did he vote "present"); and finally an unaccomplished single term in United States Senate, the entirety of which was devoted to his presidential ambitions.  He left no academic legacy in academia, authored no signature legislation as legislator.
And then there is the matter of his troubling associations: the white-hating, America-loathing preacher who for decades served as Obama's "spiritual mentor"; a real-life, actual terrorist who served as Obama's colleague and political sponsor.  It is easy to imagine a future historian looking at it all and asking: how on Earth was such a man elected president?
I have many loved ones who STILL support him because they are completely oblivious to the damage that he has caused all of us. Yes, yours truly is affected by his incompetence. While I’m not in danger of losing my job anytime soon if gas prices continue to climb I may have to trade vacation days to save on gas because I won’t be able to afford to drive to work.
I have many friends and relatives who are struggling, many working multiple jobs, some trying to go to school to obtain degrees late in life so they can make more money and some of my friends can barely keep their heads above water yet they still support this bastard, I don’t get it.
Some if they talk about their hardships give this fool (Obama) the benefit of the doubt and say
“I don’t know how Obama can fix all of this; the country was in such bad shape when he took over.”
Really!? Seriously!?  

Folks I don’t understand, I truly don’t understand. If Obama was some white guy President Peter Griffin, they would be looking to run this retarded idiot out of the White House along with every other Democrat. So here we have an affirmative action presidency. Obama is allowed to screw things up, his clueless wife is allowed to take elaborate vacations on our dime basically thumbing her nose at all of us all because he is black. 

No matter how screwed up things get if the offender in the White House happens to be black we should just give the mutherfucker a pass and ignore his incompetence.

This is what kills me, if any of you Obama supporters worked with someone clearly as clueless as Obama you would be doing whatever you could to get his ass fired.

Either people are just retarded or we have our priorities out of whack.
But make no mistake despite all of my angst against Obama, when he wins a second term in November (that is guaranteed with this GOP field) and this country goes further down the toilet blame the GOP for their lack of foresight and planning. 

Until the GOP gets its act together Democrats will continue to recycle socialist morons to the presidency.
While the GOP candidates focus on abortion and birth control, the economy will continue to crumble around our feet.


A Recipe for Disaster

  Adding spice to an anti-jobs, anti-growth "budget."
The Washington crowd can't be bothered with budgets anymore -- at least not in the dictionary sense of the word, as in (a) something cheap, i.e., a budget coat, or (a) attempting to balance expenses with expected income, or even (c) producing a realistic estimate of revenue, spending, and red ink.

For three years, the Senate's Democratic leadership has failed to even pass a budget resolution, and there's nothing even remotely credible coming out of the White House regarding entitlement reform or bringing the debt to GDP ratio into line over time to a sustainable level.

In putting together his fiscal 2013 budget, more a political speech than a serious approach at fixing anything, President Obama didn't have to do a lot of homework or original thinking.
The budget's key proposals could have been directly copied from the protest signs in the streets of Chicago outside the Democratic Convention in 1968 -- cut the military, expand the welfare state, and tax the rich.

 Is Media Matters Obama's Watergate? - The American Spectator

 Valerie Jarrett, Anita Dunn the new John Ehrlichman? White House, private investigators. 
 Can you say Tony Ulasewicz?
OK. Let's get down to cases. The case of Media Matters and all those deeply interesting stories over at Tucker Carlson's Daily Caller.
Let's add some history. Context.
Let's focus on one solitary, very bright thread in this series of stories about Media Matters, specifically the relationship between Media Matters and the Obama White House.
There is one very disturbing, very serious precedent that provides a direct link between the Obama White House and its Media Matters buddies -- and the famous Watergate scandal that brought down the Nixon presidency.
Let's start with Anthony Ulasewicz. Or, "Tony" as the late New York City cop turned private investigator turned Watergate figure was known. And Tony's friend in the NYPD's "Bureau of Special Services," Jack Caulfield.

  Climate scientist admits to defrauding the Heartland Institute
These are dark days for the “climate change” fraud.  In 2010, 141 scientists wrote a letter to the United Nations challenging the junk science of the global warming cult, declaring “climate change science is in a period of ‘negative discover’ – the more we learn about this exceptionally complex and rapidly evolving field the more we realize how little we know.  Truly, the science is not settled.”

A year later, over a thousand scientists joined forces to express their skepticism of the climate change movement.  Many of them were motivated to speak up by the “Climategate” scandal, in which emails from the East Anglia climate research unit revealed the deliberate manipulation of data by global-warming zealots.  The group continues to collect a steady stream of climate scientists who study new data and conclude the basic assumptions of “climate change” are incorrect.

The release of new data has delivered one body blow after another to the “climate change” fanatics.  Several major planet-wide studies have been released over the past couple of years, showing no significant global warming at all.  The “climate models” used to wreak havoc upon the industrialized economies of the world utterly failed to predict our current global climate.  The East Anglia fraudsters knew this was coming, which is why they were trying to “hide the decline” in global temperature data.  Actually, the degree to which global warming is not happening came as a surprise to some critics of global warming theory, who were willing to accept that some atmospheric changes might be under way, but doubted human activity was a major contributing factor.